Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
JCO Clin Cancer Inform2026;10(2):e2500303.April 1, 2026Journal Article

Interpreting Treatment Effects Using Posterior Probabilities: A Bayesian Reanalysis of 230 Phase III Oncology Trials.

Alexander D Sherry1,2, Pavlos Msaouel3,4, Gabrielle S Kupferman1, Timothy A Lin1, Joseph Abi Jaoude5, Ramez Kouzy1, Molly B El-Alam1, Roshal Patel6, Alex Koong1, Christine Lin1, Adina H Passy1, Avital M Miller1, Esther J Beck1, Clifton David Fuller1, Tomer Meirson7, Zachary R McCaw8,9, Ethan B Ludmir10,11
1Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
3Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
4Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
5Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
6Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
7Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.
8Insitro, South San Francisco, CA.
9Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
10Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
11Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most oncology trials define superiority according to dichotomized P value thresholds, which are frequently misinterpreted. Posterior probability, however, directly estimates the probability of the hypothesis at hand. Here, we reanalyze a large collection of modern phase III trials and benchmark posterior probability versus the standard trial interpretation based on statistical significanc…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.