Peer-Reviewed Publication
Cereb Cortex2026;36(10)October 5, 2026Journal Article

Lower engagement of cognitive control in children on ChatGPT.

Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus1,2,3,4,5, Yoed N Kenett3,6, Dafna Link-Sourani2,3, Emeel Ashqar2,3, Rola Farah1
1Educational Neuroimaging Group, Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
2Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
3May-Blum-Dahl Technion Human MRI Research Center (TecHMRC), Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
4Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
6Faculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) can scaffold idea generation, but how it engages control, attention, and memory systems in the developing versus mature brain, and how this relates to creativity, remains unclear. We compared 6-7-yr-old children and adults during a naturalistic 5-min co-creative dialog with ChatGPT using the same prompt, in-scanner conversation, undergoing functional magneti…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.