Peer-Reviewed Publication
Med Image Anal2026;115104296.September 8, 2026Journal Article

Learning efficient non-rigid registration in k-space for accelerated Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Aya Ghoul1, Kerstin Hammernik2, Andreas Lingg3, Patrick Krumm3, Daniel Rueckert4, Sergios Gatidis5, Thomas Küstner6
1Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. Electronic address: aya.ghoul@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
2School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
4School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
5Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
6Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Abstract

Non-rigid motion estimation at high temporal resolution is essential for dynamic and real-time Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), yet remains challenging due to the spatio-temporal sampling limitations of accelerated acquisitions. Conventional motion estimation pipelines typically reconstruct images before performing registration. However, the high undersampling required to achieve high temporal re…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.