Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Obstet Gynecol2026August 13, 2026Journal Article

A Prospective, Multi-Site Study of Performance of Cell-Free DNA Testing for Recessive Conditions in a Large, General-Risk Pregnancy Population.

Eliza R McElwee1, Julia Wynn, Shannon Rego, Andrew Haddad, Rachel Levan, Jennifer Hoskovec, Rebecca Crowe, Jalonna Robinson, Jesslyn Payne, Susan Shondel, Jennifer Byrnes, Kylan Hill, Jenny Wiggins-Smith, L Cristina Faletti, Stephanie Tims, Kelly Helton, Andre Hall, Jesus Alvarez Perez, Andrew S Haddad, Swati Verma, Emily E Hardisty, Jennifer L Czerwinski, Sunbola S Ashimi, Neeta L Vora, Akila Subramaniam
1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; BillionToOne, Menlo Park, California; Summa Health, Akron, Ohio; Shannon Medical Center, San Angelo, and the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Baptist Medical Group, Covington, Tennessee; Birth and Women's Care, Fayetteville, and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, New Jersey; and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening as a primary screening tool for autosomal recessive conditions in a large, prospective, general-risk population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective analysis of pregnant individuals who underwent carrier screening with a reflex cfDNA fetal risk assessment at nine participating U.S. institutions. The conditions eval…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.