Mini-PCNL using the new Cyber Ho with Magneto technology versus thulium fiber laser: are there any differences?

Davide Perri¹, Eugenio Ventimiglia^2,3, Umberto Besana¹, Giovannalberto Pini¹, Lorenzo Rivolta¹, Mattia Nicola Sangalli¹, Ioannis Kartalas Goumas³, Javier Romero-Otero⁴, Antonio Luigi Pastore⁵, Laurian Dragos⁶, Jean-Baptiste Roche⁷, Giorgio Bozzini¹

¹Department of Urology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, 22042, San Fermo della Battaglia, Como, Italy.

²Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

³Department of Urology, Istituto Clinico Beato Matteo, Vigevano, Italy.

⁴Department of Urology, ROC Clinic and HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.

⁵Department of Urology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

⁶Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

⁷Department of Urology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess differences in safety and efficacy between Holmium: YAG Cyber Ho generator with Magneto pulse modulation technology (Quanta System®) and Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (Mini-PCNL) of 10-20 mm renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients underwent supine Mini-PCNL using TFL Fiber Dust generator (Group A) versus Cyber Ho generator with Magneto t…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.