Position-wise comparison of handheld 6-lead ECG versus the standard 12-lead ECG in patients with arrhythmia: comparative study.

Young Jun Park¹, Sujeong Eom², Sang Jun Lee³, Yeongyeon Na², Jeonghwa Lim², Minje Park², Hyun Jin Ahn², Mineok Chang², Sunghoon Joo⁴, Min-Soo Ahn⁵

¹Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

²VUNO Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.

³Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

⁴VUNO Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea. sunghoon.joo@vuno.co.

⁵Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea. heartsaver@yonsei.ac.kr.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As 12‑lead electrocardiographs (ECGs) require a clinical infrastructure that limits timely access, portable 6‑lead devices may extend diagnostics to community and remote settings. We evaluated the signal equivalence of a handheld 6‑lead ECG (HATIV® P30) versus the standard 12‑lead in an arrhythmia cohort, considering posture and synchrony. METHODS: In this prospective single-center st…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.