Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
J Med Econ2026;29(1):1524-1525.December 1, 2026Journal Article

Response to "methodological opacity in sword health digital pelvic health".

Fabíola Costa1, Ana P Pereira1, Andrea M Seet1, Beatriz Domingues1, Dora Janela1, Akshat Pradhan1, Anabela C Areias1, Xin Tong2, Virgílio Bento1, Vijay Yanamadala1,3,4, Steven P Cohen5,6, Jennesa Atherton1, Fernando Dias Correia1,7, Luke Belz1
1Sword Health, New York, NY, USA.
2Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
3Department of Surgery, Frank H Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, USA.
4Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Westport, CT, United States.
5Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
6Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
7Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.