Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
J Med Econ2026;29(1):1492-1509.December 1, 2026Journal Article

A systematic review of acute and long-term outcomes in patients with non-transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Steven Zweibel1, David Lanctin2, Reece Holbrook2, Sunil Kapur3
1Hartford HealthCare Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, CT, USA.
2Medtronic, Inc, Mounds View, MN, USA.
3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Heart and Vascular Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems have been developed to address limitations of transvenous ICDs. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize periprocedural and long-term outcomes of non-transvenous ICD systems in adult patients with guideline-based indications for ICD therapy. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PR…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.