Tracking Engagement with Remote Patient Monitoring in Prenatal Care and Detection of Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Review.

Meylakh Barshay¹, Crystal Zang², Taylor Bolden³, Lauren Rosenfeld³, Kathryn Marko⁴, Andrew Sudimack⁵, Anish Sebastian⁶, Aditya Loganathan³, Yan Ma², Andrew C Meltzer³

¹Brown University, Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

²University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

³Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

⁴Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

⁵Patient Care Models Group, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

⁶Babyscripts, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

Introduction: Mobile technology may enhance traditional prenatal care by supporting screening and patient compliance. Although prior studies report high satisfaction with mobile prenatal technologies, the impact of integrating remote patient monitoring (RPM) into routine workflows on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. This retrospective study assessed whether higher engagement with RPM via the B…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.