Incentivizing Immunity: Black and Latinx Individuals' Attitudes About COVID-19 Vaccine Incentives.

Fernanda L Cross¹, Charles E Williams², Ana Patricia Esqueda³, Rebecca Hunt⁴, C P Ku⁵, Joel Lucio², Sarah Bailey⁶, Susie Williamson⁷, Erica E Marsh⁸, Kenneth Resnicow⁹

¹School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. flcross@umich.edu.

²School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

³Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

⁴Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

⁵Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

⁶Bridges into the Future, Ann Arbor, USA.

⁷Core Well Health, Ann Arbor, USA.

⁸Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.

⁹Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

LEARNING OBJECTIVE: Identify drivers of COVID-19 initial and booster vaccinations. BACKGROUND: Minority communities were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, yet many expressed vaccine hesitancy. While a combination of incentivized strategies, namely financial and workplace rewards or mandates, seems to have boosted the rate of vaccination, little is known about the role of vaccine incentives…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.