Electronic patient-reported outcome assessments: evaluating patient preference for the number of items per screen.

Jennifer Lord-Bessen¹, Danielle Rodriguez², Karin S Coyne², Spencer Schaff², Alexandra V Kalpadakis-Smith³

¹Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA. jennifer.lordbessen@abbvie.com.

²Evidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, USA.

³Signant Health, Blue Bell, PA, USA.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, the single-item-per-screen format is commonly used for electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). However, participant preferences for this format over multiple items per screen have not been investigated. This study evaluated participant preferences for single-item-per-screen vs. multiple-items-per-screen ePRO formats, the effect on completion times, and the com…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.