Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Surg Endosc2024;38(3):1583-1591.March 1, 2024Journal Article

Development and preliminary validation of a new task-based objective procedure-specific assessment of inguinal hernia repair procedural safety.

Vahagn C Nikolian1, Diego Camacho2, David Earle3,4, Ryan Lehmann5, Peter Nau5, Bruce Ramshaw6,7, Jonah Stulberg8
1Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA. nikolian@ohsu.edu.
2Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Surgery at Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
3New England Hernia Center, Lowell, MA, USA.
4Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
5Department of Surgery, Section of Bariatric Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
6CQInsights PBC, Knoxville, TN, USA.
7Caresyntax Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.
8Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical videos coupled with structured assessments enable surgical training programs to provide independent competency evaluations and align with the American Board of Surgery's entrustable professional activities initiative. Existing assessment instruments for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR) have limitations with regards to reliability, validity, and usability. A cros…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.