Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Semin Diagn Pathol2023;40(2):100-108.March 1, 2023Journal Article

AI in Pathology: What could possibly go wrong?

Keisuke Nakagawa1, Lama Moukheiber2, Leo A Celi2, Malhar Patel3, Faisal Mahmood4, Dibson Gondim5, Michael Hogarth6, Richard Levenson7
1UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA.
2Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
3Rhino Health, Boston, MA.
4Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
5University of Louisville, Lousville, KY.
6UC San Diego, San Diego, CA.
7UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: rmlevenson@ucdavis.edu.

Abstract

The field of medicine is undergoing rapid digital transformation. Pathologists are now striving to digitize their data, workflows, and interpretations, assisted by the enabling development of whole-slide imaging. Going digital means that the analog process of human diagnosis can be augmented or even replaced by rapidly evolving AI approaches, which are just now entering into clinical practice. But…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.