Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Eur Radiol2023;33(8):5549-5556.August 1, 2023Journal Article

X-ray dark-field chest radiography: a reader study to evaluate the diagnostic quality of attenuation chest X-rays from a dual-contrast scanning prototype.

Margarete Kattau1, Konstantin Willer2,3, Wolfgang Noichl2, Theresa Urban2,3, Manuela Frank2,3, Fabio De Marco2, Rafael Schick2,3, Thomas Koehler4,5, Hanns-Ingo Maack6, Bernhard Renger3, Martin Renz3, Andreas Sauter3, Yannik Leonhardt3, Alexander Fingerle3, Marcus Makowski3, Daniela Pfeiffer3,5, Franz Pfeiffer2,3
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering & School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany. m.kattau@outlook.de.
2Chair of Biomedical Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering & School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
4Philips Research, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
5Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
6Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the visibility of anatomical structures and overall quality of the attenuation images obtained with a dark-field X-ray radiography prototype with those from a commercial radiography system. METHODS: Each of the 65 patients recruited for this study obtained a thorax radiograph at the prototype and a reference radiograph at the commercial system. Five radiologists independent…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.