Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Iowa Orthop J2022;42(2):60-65.January 1, 2022Systematic Review

Differences in Infection Rates by Surgical Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty and Patient Sex: A Systematic Review.

Dylan T Wolff1, Neil V Shah1, Ahmed M Eldib1, Aadit T Shah2, Avi J Panchal1, Benjamin Krasnyanskiy1, Vivek Singh3, Akhilesh Sastry4, Qais Naziri1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stony Brook Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Portsmouth Regional Hospital, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There exists conflicting data that patient sex may influence complication and revision rates when undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), specifically when comparing different surgical approaches. Differences in body fat or muscular distribution are proposed mechanisms, but these are poorly understood and not well described in current literature. METHODS: A systematic review of the l…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.