Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Ther Innov Regul Sci2020;54(1):69-74.January 1, 2020Journal Article

Improving Clinical Trial Participant Prescreening With Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Comparison of the Results of AI-Assisted vs Standard Methods in 3 Oncology Trials.

Denise Calaprice-Whitty1, Karim Galil2, Wael Salloum2, Ashkon Zariv2, Bernal Jimenez2
1Calaprice-Whitty Consulting, Inc., PO Box 2451, Blue Jay, CA, 92317, USA. denise@dcwhittyconsulting.com.
2Mendel AI, San Jose, CA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delays in clinical trial enrollment and difficulties enrolling representative samples continue to vex sponsors, sites, and patient populations. Here we investigated use of an artificial intelligence-powered technology, Mendel.ai, as a means of overcoming bottlenecks and potential biases associated with standard patient prescreening processes in an oncology setting. METHODS: Mendel.ai…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.