Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
J Clin Microbiol2017;55(3):768-775.March 1, 2017Comparative Study

Evaluation of the Parasight Platform for Malaria Diagnosis.

Yochay Eshel1, Arnon Houri-Yafin1, Hagai Benkuzari1, Natalie Lezmy1, Mamta Soni2, Malini Charles2, Jayanthi Swaminathan3, Hilda Solomon3, Pavithra Sampathkumar2, Zul Premji4, Caroline Mbithi4, Zaitun Nneka4, Simon Onsongo4, Daniel Maina4, Sarah Levy-Schreier1, Caitlin Lee Cohen1, Dan Gluck1, Joseph Joel Pollak1, Seth J Salpeter5
1Sight Diagnostics Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel.
2Department of Pathology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India.
3Apollo Research and Innovations, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India.
4Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
5Sight Diagnostics Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel seth@sightdx.com.

Abstract

The World Health Organization estimates that nearly 500 million malaria tests are performed annually. While microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the main diagnostic approaches, no single method is inexpensive, rapid, and highly accurate. Two recent studies from our group have demonstrated a prototype computer vision platform that meets those needs. Here we present the results from two…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.