Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.

Margaret M O'Keeffe¹, Todd M Davis², Kerry Siminoski¹

¹Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Medical Imaging Consultants, 11010-101 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5H 4B9.

²Intelerad, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Present address: 295 Midpark Way SE, Suite 380, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2X 2A8.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess review completion rates, RADPEER score distribution, and sources of disagreement when using a workstation-integrated radiology peer review program, and to evaluate radiologist perceptions of the program. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Large private outpatient radiology practice. PARTICIPANTS: Radiologists (n = 66) with a mean of 16.0…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.