Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Arch Womens Ment Health2016;19(2):307-16.April 1, 2016Comparative Study

Development of the Perinatal Depression Inventory (PDI)-14 using item response theory: a comparison of the BDI-II, EPDS, PDI, and PHQ-9.

Benjamin B Brodey1, Sherryl H Goodman2, Ruth E Baldasaro3, Amy Brooks-DeWeese4, Melanie Elliott Wilson5, Inger S B Brodey6, Nora M Doyle7
1TeleSage, Inc., 201 E. Rosemary St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27510, USA. bb@telesage.com.
2Emory University, PAIS Building, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
3SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC, 27513-2414, USA.
4Mental Health Partners, 1333 Iris Ave., Boulder, CO, 80304-2226, USA.
5NetSmart Technologies, Inc., 4950 College Boulevard, Overland Park, KS, 66211, USA.
6University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Greenlaw 211, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 4444 E. 41st Street, Tulsa, OK, 74135, USA.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a simple, brief, self-report perinatal depression inventory that accurately measures severity in a number of populations. Our team developed 159 Likert-scale perinatal depression items using simple sentences with a fifth-grade reading level. Based on iterative cognitive interviewing (CI), an expert panel improved and winnowed the item pool based on pre-det…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.