Health AI Central
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Clin Cardiol2026;49(10):e70500.October 1, 2026Journal Article

Comparative Clinical Outcomes Across Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring Modalities.

Suneet Mittal1, Matthew R Reynolds2, Alejandro Hughes3, Erin K Buysman3, Erik M Hendrickson4, Ken Boyle4, Brent Wright4, Jeffrey M Ashburner4, Mintu P Turakhia4,5, Rod S Passman6
1Valley Health System, Paramus, New Jersey, USA.
2Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
3Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA.
4iRhythm Technologies, San Francisco, California, USA.
5Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
6Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
PubMed DOI

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness data across ambulatory cardiac monitoring (ACM) modalities are limited. OBJECTIVE: To confirm and extend comparative findings across ACM modalities and vendors in commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries without prior arrhythmia. METHODS: Retrospective study using Optum Research Database. Adults ≥ 18 years with first ACM use between January…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free AccountSign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.