AI Model Reporting Standards in Health Care: Systematic Review and Consolidation.

Ekaterina Akhmad^1,2, Daniël Slob^1,2, Aiara Lobo Gomes^1,2, Simone Mingels^1,2, Andre Dekker^1,2, Johan van Soest^1,2,3

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Paul-Henri Spaaklaan 1, Maastricht, 6229 GS, The Netherlands, +31 (0) 43 3885457.

²Maastro, Maastricht Radiation Oncology Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

³Brightlands Institute for Smart Society (BISS), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

PubMed DOI

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AI technologies are currently experiencing significant growth in development and use in health care. The AI model lifecycle includes several stages, all of which should be adequately described. Reporting standards are commonly used for this purpose. However, the plain-text structure of these standards prevents transparent machine-readability of this information. OBJECTIVE: This system…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.