Accessible data collection methods in clinical trials: do current best practices for the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) meet accessibility standards?

Florence D Mowlem¹, Paul O'Donohoe²

¹uMotif, London, UK. florence.mowlem@umotif.com.

²Medidata Solutions, London, UK.

Abstract

Apps and web browsers, whether on smartphones, tablets or laptops, have become the mainstream methods of capturing clinical outcome assessment (COA) data, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in particular, in clinical trials. There has long been concern around whether implementing traditionally paper-based questionnaires on electronic systems may impact the measurement properties of thes…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free Account Sign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.