Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Br J Radiol2026;99(1181):980-988.May 1, 2026Journal Article

Impact of a structured quantitative program on [18F]FP-CIT PET interpretation: a multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy, interrater reliability, and reader confidence.

Byungwook Choi1, Seunggyun Ha2, Sungmin Kang1, Soo Jin Kwon2,3, Junik Son4, Shin Young Jeong4,5, Sang-Woo Lee4,5, Yeong Sim Choe6, Donghyeon Kim6, Chae Moon Hong4,5
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Hospital and School of Medicine, Daegu, 42472, Republic of Korea.
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06592, Republic of Korea.
3Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.
6Research Institute, Neurophet Inc, Seoul, 06234, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the impact of a structured quantitative analysis program on diagnostic performance, interrater reliability, and reader confidence in interpreting N-3-[18F]fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-4-iodophenyl nortropane positron emission tomography ([18F]FP-CIT PET) scans to differentiate idiopathic Parkinson's disease from essential tremor-/drug-induced parkinsonism. METHO…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.