Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Nat Nanotechnol2025;20(10):1350-1353.October 1, 2025Journal Article

Implementing clinical needs into the development of wearable health-monitoring technology.

Noé Brasier1,2, Anja Domenghino3, Christoph A Meier4,5, Christine Jacob6, Shuai Xu7,8, John A Rogers8,9,10,11,12,13
1Collegium Helveticum, Zurich, Switzerland. nbrasier@ethz.ch.
2Institute of Translational Medicine, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. nbrasier@ethz.ch.
3Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
4Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
5Department of Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
6University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Olten, Switzerland.
7Sibel Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
8Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
9Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
10Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
11Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
12Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
13Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Abstract

The implementation of clinical needs and feedback throughout the development cycle of wearable health-monitoring technology is key to success. Close collaboration with all stakeholders involved will speed clinical translation to the market.

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.