Health AI Central
Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Trials2022;23(1):966.November 28, 2022Letter

Commentary: an industry perspective on the importance of incorporating participant voice before, during, and after clinical trials.

N Goodson1, P Wicks2, C Farina3
1THREAD Research, 155 El Camino Real, Tustin, CA, 92780, USA. noah.goodson@threadresearch.com.
2Wicks Digital Health Ltd, Advantage House, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 6AQ, UK.
3THREAD Research, 155 El Camino Real, Tustin, CA, 92780, USA.
PubMed PMC DOI PDF

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that involving patients and the public in the design of clinical trials can lead to better recruitment, retention, and satisfaction. A recent scoping review determined that between 1985 and 2018, just 23 articles meeting quality criteria obtained feedback from clinical trial participants after a trial had been completed. In a timespan that presumably included thousand…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free AccountSign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.