Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Eur Radiol Exp2019;3(1):25.July 11, 2019Comparative Study

Imaging features in post-mortem x-ray dark-field chest radiographs and correlation with conventional x-ray and CT.

Alexander A Fingerle1, Fabio De Marco2, Jana Andrejewski2, Konstantin Willer2, Lukas B Gromann2, Wolfgang Noichl2, Fabian Kriner3, Florian Fischer3, Christian Braun3, Hanns-Ingo Maack4, Thomas Pralow4, Thomas Koehler5,6, Peter B Noël7, Felix Meurer7, Dominik Deniffel7, Andreas P Sauter7, Bernhard Haller8, Daniela Pfeiffer7, Ernst J Rummeny7, Julia Herzen2, Franz Pfeiffer7,2,6
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany. alexander.fingerle@tum.de.
2Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
3Institute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336, Munich, Germany.
4Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
5Philips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
6Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
7Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
8Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although x-ray dark-field imaging has been intensively investigated for lung imaging in different animal models, there is very limited data about imaging features in the human lungs. Therefore, in this work, a reader study on nine post-mortem human chest x-ray dark-field radiographs was performed to evaluate dark-field signal strength in the lungs, intraobserver and interobserver agree…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.