Health AI Central
Share:
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Clin Neurophysiol Pract2019;469-75.January 1, 2019Journal Article

Comparing the quality of signals recorded with a rapid response EEG and conventional clinical EEG systems.

Baharan Kamousi1, Alexander M Grant1, Brad Bachelder1, Jianchun Yi1, Mehdi Hajinoroozi1, Raymond Woo1
1Ceribell Inc., 2483 Old Middlefield Way, Suite 120, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.
PubMed PMC DOI PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of electroencephalography (EEG) signals recorded with a rapid response EEG system and the signals recorded with conventional clinical EEG recordings. METHODS: We studied the differences between EEG recordings taken with a rapid response EEG system (Ceribell) compared to conventional EEG through two separate set of studies. First, we conducted simultaneous record…

Create a free account to keep reading

Free members get 10 full research views every month across publications, clinical trials, FDA clearances, adverse events, and NIH grants. No credit card required.

Create Free AccountSign In

Want unlimited research access? See Pro plans

Data Accuracy Notice: Research intelligence on Health AI Central is aggregated from public sources (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, NIH, CMS, and others) and refreshed nightly. Classifications and derived metrics are produced by automated methods described in our Methodology. We recommend verifying critical data points against the primary sources before making decisions.